片名: 《巴斯克维尔猎犬》完整版全集免费观看
类型: 爱情片
导演: Peter Voß,Friedrich Kayßler,Alice Brandt,Bruno Güttner,Fritz Odemar,Fritz Rasp
演员: Peter Voß,Friedrich Kayßler,Alice Brandt,Bruno Güttner,Fritz Odemar,Fritz Rasp
上映时间: 1937
发行地区: 其它
百度网友影评:我很喜欢看雷涛剧院提供的《巴斯克维尔猎犬》这部作品,从这部作品开始预告片开始,就早早的开始关注,对于Carl Lamac 的偏爱源于对生活的热爱,很多人看《巴斯克维尔猎犬》是因为对这部作品本身的喜欢,而我则是因为导演本人而对这部影评充满了期待！戏里戏外,人世人生,好马配好鞍,好戏需要好演员,《巴斯克维尔猎犬》这部作品Peter Voß,Friedrich Kayßler,Alice Brandt,Bruno Güttner,Fritz Odemar,Fritz Rasp·作为主要演员,使整部作品有了完美的效果,而其他等人则满足了不同口味观影人群的欲望幻想,看电影电视剧亦如看自己,看人生,作品是一面镜子,其中的表现繁华与真理的新芽都停格在短短的几十分钟里,只有像作品中的演员一样,结合生活才能找到作品所不能给你的人生答案!这部作品不论是手法还是气氛上,都是以人物鲜明的演技来架构全片,不忘初心回归本心!起初我以为《巴斯克维尔猎犬》爱情片更倾向于对人物肖像的刻画,以刻画时代的个体为主体,而《巴斯克维尔猎犬》开始了剧情人物和记录的手法,到今天过度到爱情片,其实算是一种较为水到渠成,比较自然的流程!作品《巴斯克维尔猎犬》所谓表现和写实之间,也包含叙事,我都有去把握一种“间离”,不是简单的沉浸在个体里然后去共情,而是我希望能通过“间离”,时不时的让观众可能会“跳”出来,去真正意识到一种观看的存在!例如我拍爱情片,并不是简单的去捕捉然后表现一个对象,我认为好的爱情片是能够发酵出镜头前后的一种人的关系,镜像的关系!由于这部片本身也不是很写实的表达,所以整个来说无论从声和画还是故事本身,都应该做到一种有机的契合! 很喜欢作品《巴斯克维尔猎犬》一镜到底的运动长镜头,这是我最喜欢的一段,也是我认为本片的最大亮点!我真的很喜欢一镜到底所带来的沉浸感,仿佛跟着主角的步伐一起经历发生的事,这是只有电影这种视听艺术所带来的独特体验! 整部作品《巴斯克维尔猎犬》剧情虽简单,但却并没有因为时间的限制而显得仓促不完整,虽然故事中仍有细节未解释,但整体下来观感不错!整部电影的亮点在于浑身粘液、触手,酷似菊石与象拔蚌合体的怪兽,与秀色可餐,长相甜美的教授和少女!感谢雷涛剧院(http://www.leitaofamen.net)得以在繁忙之中邂逅这部令我垂涎已久的口碑佳作!
《巴斯克维尔猎犬》剧情简介:
A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
Copyright © 2016-2023 All Rights Reserved
