片名: 《没有和解》完整版全集免费观看
类型: 喜剧片
导演: Heinrich Hargesheimer,Carlheinz Hargesheimer,Martha Staendner,达尼埃尔·于伊耶,Henning Harmssen,Ulrich Hopmann,Joachim Weiler,Eva-Maria Bold,Hiltraud Wegener,Ulrich von Thüna,Ernst Kutzinski,Karl Bodenschatz,
演员: Heinrich Hargesheimer,Carlheinz Hargesheimer,Martha Staendner,达尼埃尔·于伊耶,Henning Harmssen,Ulrich Hopmann,Joachim Weiler,Eva-Maria Bold,Hiltraud Wegener,Ulrich von Thüna,Ernst Kutzinski,Karl Bodenschatz,
上映时间: 1965
发行地区: 其它
百度网友影评:我很喜欢看雷涛剧院提供的《没有和解》这部作品,从这部作品开始预告片开始,就早早的开始关注,对于让-马里·斯特劳布 达尼埃尔·于伊耶 的偏爱源于对生活的热爱,很多人看《没有和解》是因为对这部作品本身的喜欢,而我则是因为导演本人而对这部影评充满了期待!戏里戏外,人世人生,好马配好鞍,好戏需要好演员,《没有和解》这部作品Heinrich Hargesheimer,Carlheinz Hargesheimer,Martha Staendner,达尼埃尔·于伊耶,Henning Harmssen,Ulrich Hopmann,Joachim Weiler,Eva-Maria Bold,Hiltraud Wegener,Ulrich von Thüna,Ernst Kutzinski,Karl Bodenschatz,·作为主要演员,使整部作品有了完美的效果,而其他等人则满足了不同口味观影人群的欲望幻想,看电影电视剧亦如看自己,看人生,作品是一面镜子,其中的表现繁华与真理的新芽都停格在短短的几十分钟里,只有像作品中的演员一样,结合生活才能找到作品所不能给你的人生答案!这部作品不论是手法还是气氛上,都是以人物鲜明的演技来架构全片,不忘初心回归本心!起初我以为《没有和解》喜剧片更倾向于对人物肖像的刻画,以刻画时代的个体为主体,而《没有和解》开始了剧情人物和记录的手法,到今天过度到喜剧片,其实算是一种较为水到渠成,比较自然的流程!作品《没有和解》所谓表现和写实之间,也包含叙事,我都有去把握一种“间离”,不是简单的沉浸在个体里然后去共情,而是我希望能通过“间离”,时不时的让观众可能会“跳”出来,去真正意识到一种观看的存在!例如我拍喜剧片,并不是简单的去捕捉然后表现一个对象,我认为好的喜剧片是能够发酵出镜头前后的一种人的关系,镜像的关系!由于这部片本身也不是很写实的表达,所以整个来说无论从声和画还是故事本身,都应该做到一种有机的契合! 很喜欢作品《没有和解》一镜到底的运动长镜头,这是我最喜欢的一段,也是我认为本片的最大亮点!我真的很喜欢一镜到底所带来的沉浸感,仿佛跟着主角的步伐一起经历发生的事,这是只有电影这种视听艺术所带来的独特体验! 整部作品《没有和解》剧情虽简单,但却并没有因为时间的限制而显得仓促不完整,虽然故事中仍有细节未解释,但整体下来观感不错!整部电影的亮点在于浑身粘液、触手,酷似菊石与象拔蚌合体的怪兽,与秀色可餐,长相甜美的教授和少女!感谢雷涛剧院(http://www.leitaofamen.net)得以在繁忙之中邂逅这部令我垂涎已久的口碑佳作!
《没有和解》剧情简介:
The subtitle of Jean-Marie Straub and Danièle Huillet’s first feature, from 1965, “Only Violence Helps Where Violence Reigns,” suggests the fierce political program evoked by their rigorous aesthetic. The pretext of the film, set in Cologne, is Heinrich Böll’s novel “Billiards at Half Past Nine,” which they strip down to a handful of stark events and film with a confrontational angularity akin to Bartók’s music that adorns the soundtrack. The subtlest of cues accompany the story’s complex flashbacks. The middle-aged Robert Fähmel tells a young hotel bellhop of persecutions under the Third Reich; his elderly father, Heinrich, an architect famed for a local abbey, recalls the militarism of the First World War, when his wife, Johanna, incurred trouble for insulting the Kaiser. A third-generation Fähmel is considering architecture, just as the exiled brother of Robert’s late wife, returns, only to be met by their former torturer, now a West German official taking part in a celebratory parade of war veterans. Straub and Huillet make the layers of history live in the present tense, which they judge severely. The tamped-down acting and the spare, tense visual rhetoric suggest a state of moral crisis as well as the response—as much in style as in substance—that it demands.
Copyright © 2016-2023 All Rights Reserved